The United Nations' Global Government Agenda

The concept of a one-‐world government is not new. Winston Churchill said, “The creation of an authoritative world order is the ultimate aim toward which we must strive,” i and Charles De Gaulle was convinced that “Nations must unite in a world government or perish.” ii

Just like the religious unity movement, the world government movement has the underlying purpose of increasing the power of the Papacy. Historian and author Bill Hughes explains:

“The Jesuits failed in their attempts to have a world governing body following World War One. They accomplished their sinister goal after World War Two. Following the war, the weary, aching world was conditioned to accept an international government, and the United Nations was born. Since the creation of the United Nations in 1945, this so-called ‘peace-keeping’ body has failed miserably in keeping peace around the world. Why? Because keeping peace is not their purpose, even though they continue to claim that it is. There are presently some 83 different wars around the world. However, it has certainly been instrumental in suppressing liberty loving people. Katanga and Rhodesia are just two examples of nations crushed by U. N. forces. The United Nations has worked tirelessly to restore the temporal power of the papacy — its purpose from the beginning.” iii

We can see the signs of this world government strategy that is both political and spiritual:

Humanism

Modern Humanism, a movement that promotes equality, human rights, and the opinion that “No deity can save us, we must save ourselves,”iv says this in its 1973 Manifesto II:

We deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds. We have reached a turning point in human history where the best option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignty and to move toward the building of a world community…we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government.v

Political Organizations

Both public and secret organizations are leading the way toward global government. These organizations include the following:

•The United Nations (UN)
•The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
•The Trilateral Commission
•The Bilderberg Group
•The Gorbachev Foundation
•The Club of Rome

Jim Garrison, president of the Gorbachev Foundation/USA,vi said this:

“We are going to end up with world government. It’s inevitable…There’s going to be conflict, coercion, and consensus. That’s all part of what will be required as we give birth to the first global civilization.” vii

Philip Jessup, a CFR member and World Court justice, writes, “National sovereignty is the root of the evil.” viii It sounds like Jessup believes individual nations should not exist. Could this be the United Nations’ idea for a new world order?

The United Nation’s Communist Roots

Since World War II, the United Nations have been one tool used to promote the global agenda.

The UN Charter was drawn up in 1945 in San Francisco, under the leadership of mainly Americans including Alger Hiss, the UN Secretary-‐General. Hiss was accused of being a communist and a Soviet spy—which he denied. He was later convicted of perjury and spent 44 months in prison for his crimes.ix

The United Nations Charter itself, according to researcher David Rivera, is patterned “after the Constitution of Russia, and the Communist Manifesto.”x Writer Des Griffin says that “the Constitution of the U.S.S.R. is almost identical to the Constitution of the UN.”xi

It is worth noting that the United States—a key capitalist nation—not only signed this Communist-‐leaning Charter but was instrumental in forming the ideas and language that make up this socialistic document.

We should not think that a new world order will only happen in the distant future. A socialist global government is already starting to form. In his book En Route to Global Occupation, Gary Kah shows us that the World Constitution and Parliament Association (WCPA) has already created a global constitution: “The Constitution of the Federation of Earth.”xii

Even this Constitution itself declared that we are on the verge of a new world order:
Humanity today has come to a turning point in history and that we are on the threshold of an new world order which promises to usher in an era of peace, prosperity, justice and harmony.xiii

The History of the United Nations

In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt coined the term “United Nations,” the name first used to describe the 26 nations who pledged their governments to fight the Axis powers during World War II. But the idea of global government has been around since a lot earlier than the 20th century. Stephen P. Duggan Sr., former Director of the Council on Foreign Relations, explains:

The idea of preserving unity among civilized men, of promoting universal allegiance to a common lawgiver and obedience to a common law, appealed powerfully to thoughtful men throughout the “Dark” and “Middle” Ages, and has continued to affect mankind to the present day.i

The first recent attempt at creating a “universal allegiance to a common lawgiver” was the League of Nations, an organization established in 1919 after World War I “to promote international cooperation and to achieve peace and security.”ii Peace and security may seem like noble goals, but when we remember that the Jesuits have been working behind the scenes to bring the world under the authority of the Papacy, the whole idea of a universal allegiance becomes less innocent.

Historian Bill Hughes tell us this:

After World War One, an attempt was made to set up a one-world government, and the League of Nations was established. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge Sr. prevented the United States from joining the League of Nations. The Jesuits’ plot to create a one world governing body from which they could control the world, was stopped only temporarily. This part of the Jesuits’ plan had to wait another 27 years for a repeat performance, when the Second World War would result in the United Nations.iii
The United Nations website tells us that “the United Nations officially came into existence on October 24, 1945.”iv

Arthur Balfour

Arthur Balfour (1848-‐1930) was one man instrumental in the forming of the League of Nations. He was Prime Minister of England from 1902 to 1905 and later became Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. Balfour represented Britain in the League from 1920 until 1922.v

Balfour was a member of several secret societies such as the Apostles Club, and in 1893 served as president of the Society for Psychical Research.vi Biographer Eugene Rasor writes that Balfour “visited mediums, arranged seances, and was a spiritualist…seances were held at (his townhome) Carlton Gardens.”vii

Arthur Balfour also helped in founding a group called the Synthetic Society.viii Balfour invited Frederic Myers of the Society for Psychical Research to join, and together they created “The preamble of all religions,” which says, “We can therefore obtain information about the metetherial plane by ‘communicating’ with the discarnate in the orthodox ways.”ix

Balfour and his Synthetic Society aren’t the only spiritual foundations of the United Nations. Read about UN official Robert Muller and his plans for one-‐world education and religion

Political Concerns

The stated aim of the United Nations is “maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations and promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights.”x However, the political backgrounds of many important UN officials point towards socialist philosophy.

David Rivera writes this in his book Final Warning: The History of the New World Order:

Trygve Lie, the first official UN Secretary-General, was a high-ranking member of Norway’s Social Democratic Labor Party, which was an offshoot of the Third Communist International. Dag Hammarskjöld, the second Secretary-General, was a Swedish socialist who openly pushed communist policies, and U Thant, the third Secretary, was a Marxist.xi

Dag Hammarskjöld was responsible for the interreligious meditation room at the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

U Thant, mentor to Robert Muller, praised Russian communist Vladimir Lenin’s leadership, saying that his “ideals of peace and peaceful coexistence among states have won widespread international acceptance and they are in line with the aims of the U. N. charter.”xii Thant was also a key supporter of a one-‐world government. He said this:

I can only conclude from the information that is available to me as Secretary-General that the members of the United Nations have perhaps ten years left in which to subordinate their ancient quarrels and launch a global partnership.xiii

World federalists hold before us the vision of a unified mankind living in peace under a just world order…The heart of their program—a world under law—is realistic and attainable.xiv

The Spiritual United Nations

The political goal of the United Nations is just that: to unite the nations in order to achieve a global government. The UN is well on its way to establishing a one-‐world government; a global court is already in place. However, is it possible that the masterminds behind the workings of the United Nations are after more than just political unity? As we will see, the UN is also seeking the unity of all religions:

Planetary Citizens and Findhorn

In 1973, UN Secretary-‐General U Thant and New Age activist Donald Keys founded Planetary Citizens. This organization is now a UN-‐recognized non-‐governmental organization, “devoted to preparing people for the coming of the new culture.”i

Donald Keys has been actively involved with the Findhorn Community in Scotland and writes regularly for its magazine One Earth. Findhorn promotes New Age teaching as “a spiritual community, ecovillage and an international centre for holistic education, helping to unfold a new human consciousness and create a positive and sustainable future.”ii

Planetary Citizens and the Findhorn Foundation are just two of the organizations connected to the United Nations that teach blatant New Age, Earth worship, and Luciferian doctrine.
Keys wrote this in One Earth:

The New Age groups are focusing and entering a new stage—a world related stage. They are becoming mature enough to begin to shoulder some of the load of humanity’s burden.iii

David Spangler, co-‐director and spokesperson for the Findhorn Foundation explains the organization’s Luciferian views:

The true light of Lucifer cannot be seen through sorrow, through darkness, through rejection. The true light of this great being can only be recognized when one’s own eyes can see with the light of the Christ, the light of the inner sun. Lucifer works within each of us to bring us to wholeness, and as we move into a New Age, which is the age of man’s wholeness…

Lucifer prepares man in all ways for the experience of Christhood and the Christ prepares man for the experience of God…the light that reveals to us the path to the Christ comes from Lucifer. He is the light giver. He is aptly named the Morning Star because it is his light that heralds for man the dawn of a greater consciousness…He stands no longer as the tester or the tempter but as the great initiator, the one who hands the soul over to the Christ and from the Christ on into ever greater realms.iv

David Spangler also gives a clearly satanic understanding of Scripture:

We can take all the scriptures and all the teachings and all the tablets and all the laws, and all the marshmallows and have a jolly good bonfire and marshmallow roast, because that is all they are worth.v

The Temple of Understanding

The Temple of Understanding (TOU) is a non-‐governmental organization with the goal of promoting understanding between religions. Founded by Juliet Hollister in 1960, the TOU endorses tolerance and “respect for religious pluralism” through its many international courses and programs.vi

The TOU webpage tells us that Eleanor Roosevelt “was among the first to endorse the concept,” saying, “our world surely needs the inspiration and leadership of such a ‘Spiritual United Nations’.”vii

The TOU has had countless supporters and “Founding Friends,” most notably UN Secretary-‐General U Thant, the Dalai Lama, Pope John VIII, mystic Thomas Merton, and Mother Teresa.viii

The Temple of Understanding is based at the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine in New York City. St. John the Divine, the largest cathedral in the world, is the “cathedral of the Episcopal Diocese of New York and the Seat of its Bishop.”ix

Deeply connected with the United Nations, the Temple of Understanding “is dedicated to advancing social justice in the global context of today’s world by promoting the UN Millennium Development Goals.”x TOU also holds UN workshops and even a “life-‐changing” six-‐week UN internship for students to learn about the “inner workings of The United Nations.”xi

Alice Bailey and the United Nations

In 1932, theosophist Alice Bailey and her husband, 32-‐degree Freemason Foster Bailey, started World Goodwill—an official non-‐governmental organization within the United Nations. World Goodwill has three stated aims:

* To help mobilise the energy of goodwill;
* To cooperate in the work of preparation for the reappearance of the Christ;
* To educate public opinion on the causes of the major world problems and to help create the thoughtform of solution.

The Baileys were not using World Goodwill to prepare the world for Jesus Christ, but rather the New Age Cosmic Christ who would unite all religions and countries. This is another example of how global politics are really being used for the hidden agenda of uniting the world’s religions.

Who’s Pulling the Strings?

The idea that the United Nations and international political unity is simply a tool for religious unification is mind-‐blowing. We believe that this plan could come from only one source, and the leaders of theosophy give us the proof.
Alice Bailey claimed this:

Evidence of the growth of the human intellect along the needed receptive lines [for the preparation of the New Age] can be seen in the “planning” of various nations and in the efforts of the United Nations to formulate a world plan…From the very start of this unfoldment, three occult factors have governed the development of all these plans.ii

She did not spell out clearly the identity of these “three occult factors,” but stated this:

Within the United Nations is the germ and seed of a great international and meditating, reflective group—a group of thinking and informed men and women in whose hands lies the destiny of humanity. This is largely under the control of many fourth ray disciples, if you could but realise it, and their point of meditative focus is the intuitional or buddhic plane—the plane upon which all hierarchical activity is today to be found.iii

Bailey is claiming here that the inner core of the UN is controlled by those under the control of Lucifer.

According to Helena Blavatsky, founder of the theosophical movement, “Lucifer represents…Life…Thought…Progress…Civilization…Liberty…Independence…Lucifer is the Logos…the Serpent, the Savior…It is Satan who is the God of our planet and the only God.”iv,v

Blavatsky also said this:

The Celestial Virgin which thus becomes the Mother of Gods and Devils at one and the same time; for she is the ever-loving beneficent Deity…but in antiquity and reality Lucifer or Luciferius is the name. Lucifer is divine and terrestial Light, ‘the Holy Ghost’ and ‘Satan’ at one and the same time.vi

These disgusting blasphemies show us how the religions are being brought together in preparation for the coming of the Cosmic Christ—Lucifer. In theosophy, the New Age movement, many world religions, and now even in global politics, Jesus Christ is being presented as nothing but a good man, and Lucifer, the Universal Cosmic Christ, is attempting to steal His position and power on Earth.

One World

How does this hidden agenda affect the United Nations? We see from New Age teaching that the UN is being used to prepare the Earth for the New Age Christ’s reappearance. Initiatives such as the UN’s Millennium Development Goals are bringing the world closer to the universal political and religious peace the New Age Christ is calling for. Here are some statements from Dwhjal Khul through Alice Bailey on the issue:

First of all, he will come to a world which is essentially one world.vii
The reply comes with clarity; he will come unfailingly when a measure of peace has been restored.viii

Discover the members of the new group of world servers, whenever possible, and strengthen their hands. Look for them in every nation and expressing many lines of thought and points of view. Remember always that in doctrine and dogma, and in techniques and methods, they may differ widely from you, but in love for their fellowmen, in practical goodwill and in devotion to the establishing of right human relations they stand with you, they are your equals, and can probably teach you much.ix

The major effect of his appearance will surely be to demonstrate in every land the effects of a spirit of inclusiveness—an inclusiveness which will be channelled or expressed through him. All who seek right human relations will be gathered automatically to him, whether they are in one of the great world religions or not…all who see no true or basic difference between religion and religion or between man and man or nation and nation will rally around him; those who embody the spirit of exclusiveness and separateness will stand automatically and equally revealed and all men will know them for what they are.x

These statements encourage “goodwill” and “right human relations.” But are they anything other than blind inclusiveness? “Goodwill” is not true unity, and “right human relations” will never lead to lasting peace. “Right humans relations” seems to be more about conformity than about truly caring for others.

Goodwill

The Baileys’ initiative was called World Goodwill. Dwhjal Khul speaks of the necessity of goodwill, as do Christian and Catholic leaders of today. In fact, the Pope repeatedly calls on “all people of good will” to follow his commands—even in his most recent encyclical. So what is it?

Here’s some explanation from Alice Bailey. Remember that the “right human relations” she discusses here are not based on love but on conformity.

The major required preparation [for the coming of the false Christ] is a world at peace; however, that peace must be based on an educated goodwill, which will lead inevitably to right human relations, and therefore to the establishment of lines of light between nation and nation, religion and religion, group and group and man and man.xi

Promote ceaselessly the work of World Goodwill, so that every nation may have its group of men and women dedicated to the establishing of right human relations.xii
The Tibetan has asked me to make clear that when he is speaking of the Christ he is referring to His official name as head of the Hierarchy. The Christ works for all men irrespective of their faith; He does not belong to the Christian world any more than to the Buddhist or Mohammedan or any other faith. There is no need for any man to join the Christian church in order to be affiliated with Christ. The requirements are to love your fellowmen, lead a disciplined life, recognise the divinity in all faiths and all beings and rule your daily life with Love.xiii

It is on the foundation of this teaching that Christ will raise the super structure of the Brotherhood of Man, for right human relations are an expression of the love of God.xiv

Goodwill is a love for fellow humans that replaces love for God—and even demotes God. The New Age teaches that we are God. Goodwill is a new, human-‐based religion under which the religions of the world can unite. In this new world religion, human rights and peace at all costs become the main issues, and the power shifts from God to people. How does this align with God’s Word? Consider Martin Luther’s battle cry:
Peace if possible. Truth at all costs.

While the United Nations and the New Age movement are calling for inclusiveness and peace, the Bible calls us to come out and be separate (see Revelation 18:4). We are not to join in an emotional, human rights-‐based religion but to proclaim the truth to all people.

The United Nations Prayer Room

In the early 1950s, Dag Hammarskjöld, second Secretary-‐General of the United Nations, was appalled by the small room provided for prayer and meditation in the New York UN Headquarters. He spearheaded a campaign, supported by the multifaith “Friends of the UN Meditation Room” group, to revamp the room.i

“Mr. Hammarskjöld personally planned and supervised in every detail the creation of the ‘Meditation Room,'” which reopened in 1957.ii

Journalist Pauline Frederick tell us that Hammarskjöld “had a very close feeling about the spiritual. And he felt that it should be the center of the United Nations.”iii What kind of spirituality did he have in mind?

One God, Many Forms?

In his note to visitors of the Meditation Room, Hammarskjöld said this:
But the stone in the middle of the room has more to tell us. We may see it as an altar, empty not because there is no God, not because it is an altar to an unknown god, but because it is dedicated to the God whom man worships under many names and in many forms.iv

The spirituality promoted in the United Nations Meditation Room is the same as that promoted by many of the UN’s influences: the coming of a Universal Christ to satisfy all religions. Teilhard and Robert Muller, as well as Muller’s inspiration Alice Bailey, all spoke of this “God whom man worships under many names.”

Hints of the Occult

The main features of the Meditation Room are its trapezoidal shape, its lighting, and its decoration: a mural and a large block of iron. Texe Marrs explains the occult nature of these features:

Perhaps the best way to comprehend what the all-seeing eye represents is to examine the architecture of the Meditation Room of the United Nations Building in New York City. The Meditation Room is…shaped as a pyramid without the capstone. Inside, the room is dimly lit, but coming from the ceiling is a narrow but concentrated pinpoint beam of light which radiates down to a bleak stone altar.

On the wall straight ahead is a breathtaking, modernistic mural that is dynamically endowed with occult symbolism, containing twenty-seven triangles in various configurations, a mixture of black and white and colored background, and a snakelike vertical line. At the center is the all-seeing eye, which grips the millions of annual U.N. visitors with its stark, beckoning image of suspicion and omnipresence.v

The trapezoid is of interest because of its dark spiritual connections. Authors Schnoebelen and Spencer tell us that, “Anton LaVey, the founder of the Church of Satan, refers to an occult principle known as the ‘law of the Trapezoid'” and that, “the middle order of the satanic brotherhood is called ‘The Order of the Trapezoid.'”vi

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881-‐1955) was a French Jesuit priest and scientist. He studied and practiced paleontology, theology, and philosophy.Teilhard was also a supporter of a one-‐world government. Some call him “The Father of the New Age.”i

According to one biographer, Teilhard “spent the bulk of his life trying to integrate religious experience with natural science, most specifically Christian theology with theories of evolution. In this endeavor he became absolutely enthralled with the possibilities for humankind, which he saw as heading for an exciting convergence of systems, an ‘Omega point’ where the coalescence of consciousness will lead us to a new state of peace and planetary unity.”ii

This meshing of evolution and religion inevitably resulted in the New Age thinking that Teilhard promoted throughout his life.

Here are some of the key phrases Teilhard developed:

The Omega Point

One of Teilhard’s most widespread ideas is the Omega Point. According to Teilhard, the Omega Point is a level of consciousness and unity that the whole universe is evolving towards. To him the Omega is a personal, transcendent being that is not constrained by time or space. Teilhard writes this in his book On Love and Happiness:

The world would not function if there did not exist, somewhere ahead in time and space, “a cosmic point Omega” of total synthesis.iii

Christ Consciousness

Along the same lines as the Omega Point is Teilhard de Chardin’s theory of Christ consciousness:

Christ Consciousness is the growing human recognition and blending of the human evolutionary (or ego) mind with the Divine Mind and the Divine Personality that is the source of human happiness and fulfillment.iv

Super-‐humanity

According to Teilhard, humanity is evolving towards complete unity into a single organism, a completely unanimous super-‐humanity:

The outcome of the world, the gates of the future, the entry into the super-human— They will open only to an advance of all together, in a direction in which all together can join and find completion in a spiritual renovation of the earth.v
In On Love and Happiness, Teilhard writes this:

…we human beings are already forming but one single body…our thoughts are tending more and more to function like the cells of one and the same brain. This must inevitably mean that as the transformation follows its natural line of progress we can foresee the time when men will understand what it is, animated by one single heart, to be united together in wanting, hoping for, and loving the same things at the same time.

The mankind of tomorrow is emerging from the mists of the future, and we can actually see it taking shape: a “super-mankind,” much more conscious, much more powerful, and much more unanimous than our own…what life ultimately calls upon us to do in order that we may be, is to incorporate ourselves into, and to subordinate ourselves to, an organic totality of which, cosmically speaking, we are no more than conscious particles.vi

Noosphere

Teilhard used the term “noosphere” to refer to his idea of the place where all this mental harmony and spiritual unity will occur. Tom Butler-‐Bowden describes the noosphere as the “mental counterpart” to the biosphere, or the “invisible layer of thought around the earth that is the sum total of humankind’s mental and spiritual states, all culture, love and knowledge.”vii

Teilhard’s Spirituality

As both a Jesuit priest and a scientist, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin sought to bring together elements of the Christian faith with the theory of evolution. The result was a departure from both Christian doctrine and evolutionary science.

Teilhard’s views deeply influenced the New Age world. In fact, as Gary Kah tells us, “Chardin is one of the most frequently quoted writers by leading New Age occultists.”i Here are some of the New Age doctrines that Teilhard promoted:

The Universal Christ

The universal Christ, or Maitreya, is not Jesus Christ but rather a New Age Ascended Master who is said to come and lead all religions into unity. This universal Christ is an attempt to steal the glory from the true Christ, Jesus. Here are Teilhard’s thoughts on the matter:

…a general convergence of religions upon a universal Christ who satisfies them all: that seems to me the only possible conversion of the world, and the only form in which a religion of the future can be conceived (emphasis added).ii

I believe that the Messiah whom we await, whom we all without any doubt await, is the universal Christ; that is to say, the Christ of evolution.iii

Pantheism

The view that the universe and God are identical, or that nature is God, is a New Age belief that Teilhard supported:

My approach…would be…to narrow that gap…by bringing out what one might call the Christian soul of pantheism or the pantheist aspect of Christianity.iv

I can be saved only by becoming one with the universe.v

Human Divinity

One of the key elements of New Age doctrine is the belief that humans are divine. The idea that people are immortal gods is a lie that Satan has used for millennia to pull people away from God and His truth. Author Dave Hunt tells us that “Teilhard dreamed of humanity merging into ‘God’ and each realizing his own godhood at the Omega point. This belief has inspired many of today’s New Age leaders.”vi Teilhard said this:

It is a law of the universe that in all things there is prior existence. Before every form there is a prior, but lesser evolved form. Each one of us is evolving towards the God- head.vii

As we know, the belief that the human individual cannot perfect himself or fully exist except through the organic unification of all men in God is essential and fundamental to Christian doctrine.viii

Catholic theologian Malachi Martin (1921-‐1999) describes Teilhard de Chardin’s theology in his book The Jesuits:

Once complete unity has been achieved, Christ—who will be the Omega Point—will appear; man will then be more than man, will be what Teilhard called Ultra-Human, the cosmos will be transformed; and the glory of it all will be established.ix

Based on the prominence of New Age doctrine in Teilhard’s writings, it’s no surprise that a survey of New Agers showed that the leading influence of their “spiritual awakening” was Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.x

Teilhard had strong opinions not only about spirituality but about government as well.

Teilhard’s One-‐World Government

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin’s teachings on unity, the Omega Point, and the universal Christ had a deep impact not only on the New Age world but on the leaders of a worldwide unity movement: the United Nations.

Teilhard wrote this:

Although the form is not yet discernible, mankind tomorrow will awaken to a “pan- organized” world.i

…we human beings are already forming but one single body…our thoughts are tending more and more to function like the cells of one and the same brain.iii

This type of worldwide amalgamation is being proposed in the United Nations. The danger begins when anyone tries to oppose the one-‐world government or one-‐ world religion. Those who refuse comply will be trampled by those racing towards a “pan-‐organized” society.

Robert Muller

Robert Muller, former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, is a strong believer in Teilhard’s theories. Notice his comments:

We must move as quickly as possible to a one-world government; a one-world religion; under a one-world leader.iv

Teilhard had always viewed the United Nations as the progressive institutional embodiment of his philosophy.v

…Teilhard de Chardin influenced his companion [Father de Breuvery], who inspired his colleagues, who started a rich process of global and long-term thinking in the UN, which affected many nations and people around the world. I have myself been deeply influenced by Teilhard.vi

Muller explains here how such unBiblical and nonsensical doctrines as Teilhard’s could have the deep influence they do on the United Nations. Teilhard simply had to convince a few of the right, influential people in the intellectual world. Soon, scholars started discussing his ideas, and the United Nations ben to take them to heart. We must remember that Teilhard was a Jesuit, and had the power of that society behind him, along with the responsibility to bolster global unity as a way to increase the Papacy’s political power.

Unfortunately, we stopped listening to God’s wisdom and turned instead to human wisdom. And when we stop listening to God, we are deceived by the Enemy.

Robert Muller’s Global Education

Robert Muller (born 1923) may be most well known for his role as Assistant Secretary-‐General of the United Nations, or perhaps for his founding and developing of the United Nations University of Peace in Costa Rica. However, it was his spirituality that led him to take on these jobs, strive for world peace, and even create a global education curriculum.

Muller’s Ideals

Here’s what Muller’s website has to say about his spirituality:

He has been called the “Philosopher” and “Prophet of Hope” of the United Nations. Robert Muller is a deeply spiritual person. From his vantage point of a top level global states-person he has seen a strong connection between spirituality and the political/cultural scene.i

Here’s some advice from Muller in 1986:

Decide to open yourself to God, to the Universe, to all your brethren and sisters, to your inner self…to the potential of the human race, to the infinity of your inner self, and you will become the universe…you will become infinity, and you will be at long last your real, divine, stupendous self.ii

Is this what we want the children of the world believing about themselves—that they will become the universe, become divine?

And here’s an excerpt from Muller’s 1989 UNESCO Prize for Peace Education acceptance speech:

I pray that all human beings of this Earth become instruments of peace, thus fulfilling the cosmic function deeply engraved in each of us and for which we were born and allowed to live temporarily on this beautiful planet in the vast universe and eternal stream of time. The peace of the world is the sum-total of the peace of all individuals.iii

What type of peace does Muller propose? What “philosophies” and “prophecies of hope” does this internationally-‐influential political and spiritual leader bring to the world?

According to the preface of Robert Muller’s World Core Curriculum, “The underlying philosophy upon which the Robert Muller School is based will be found in the teachings set forth in the books of Alice A. Bailey.”

Muller’s Mentor

One of Muller’s key influences was U Thant (1909-‐1974), whom Muller called “my spiritual master.”iv

U Thant was a Burmese diplomat, and Secretary-‐General of the United Nations from 1961 to 1971.v A Buddhist, Marxist,vi and supporter of global government, he said this in 1969:

I do not wish to seem overdramatic, but I can only conclude from the information that is available to me as Secretary-General that the members of the United Nations have perhaps ten years left in which to subordinate their ancient quarrels and launch a global partnership to curb the arms race, to improve the human environment, to diffuse the population explosion, and supply the required momentum to world development efforts.vii

He also told Muller, “The world will not change and find peace if there is not a new education.”viii This new education is becoming a reality through Robert Muller’s World Core Curriculum.

Muller’s New Age World Core Curriculum

Robert Muller is known as a “father of global education,”ix and received the UNESCO Peace Education Prize in 1989 for his World Core Curriculum, a global education program.x

As a former Assistant Secretary-‐General of the United Nations, Muller’s clout in the international community is impressive. It should not be surprising, then, that Muller’s World Core Curriculum is discussed in UN circles as an innocent and useful education tool.

At the UN’s 56th Annual DPI/NGO Conference in September 2003, a workshop explained how Muller “developed a core curriculum to teach the whole child.”xi It discusses how Muller’s curriculum “included hygiene, gardening, vocational training, marketing, entrepreneurship, as well as values and respect.”xii

What the speaker neglected to mention was the seriousness of the occult and New Age philosophies and practices being spread through Robert Muller’s program.

The first Robert Muller School opened in 1979, with dozens more following.xiii

Thousands of people now use his program, and Muller believes every school in the world should teach his curriculum. What are the key points of Muller’s message that he wants every person on Earth to learn?

Spirituality

As we have already seen, Robert Muller believes in the divinity of humanity and “was deeply influenced”xiv by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a Jesuit priest who taught that all of humanity would eventually meld into one super-‐being through the coming of the Cosmic Christ.

Muller’s World Curriculum framework includes teaching on “Spiritual exercises of interiority, meditation prayer, communication with the universe, eternity and God.”xv These spiritual exercises, meditation, and mystic communication are marks of New Age spirituality.

According to United Nations OnLine, “The scope of the curriculum will always be the same; to allow the student to see himself truly, as an integral part of the Cosmos…At the moment, it seems the only limitation will be the imagination of the Cosmic-‐ minded and spiritually oriented teaching staff.”xvi

And we cannot forget what the World Core Curriculum itself tells us about Muller’s source of inspiration:

The underlying philosophy upon which The Robert Muller School is based will be found in the teachings set forth in the books of Alice A. Bailey by the Tibetan Teacher of Djwhal Khul…and the teaching of Morya as given in the Agni Yoga series books.xvii

Alice Bailey (1880-‐1949) was a New Age leader and a channel for Djwhal Khul, a demon disguised as a master of wisdom. Bailey’s Luciferian channeled messages from Djwhal Khul are published through her organization, the Lucis Trust Association. Lucis Trust is a United Nations-‐affiliated NGO. Lucis Trust gained consultative status with the UN in 1989.xviii

Unity under the United Nations

Along with a New Age spirituality, Muller’s Core Curriculum teaches a socialist political unity established under the United Nations. Muller says this:
History will prove that Gloria Crook, U Thant and the United Nations were right. The quicker all educators and media will listen to them, the quicker we will get out of the present confusion and find a new, promising way of our progress and evolution. Please, all teachers of the world, listen to them.xix

According to New Man magazine, Muller’s World Core Curriculum is meant to “steer our children toward global citizenship, earth-‐centered beliefs, socialist values and the collective mindset which is becoming a requirement for the 21st century workforce.”xx

Gloria Crook, the founder of the first Robert Muller School in Arlington, Texas, speaks of the importance of the UN in this process of global citizenship:
The Curriculum was born out of Robert Muller’s 40 year experience with the United Nations, and it will be discovered that an understanding of the United Nations, its structure and purposes, will be a most rewarding factor.xxi
Is steering our children towards socialism really what’s best for them? Muller isn’t the only proponent of global education in the United Nations.

Global Citizenship

Julian Huxley (1887-‐1975), the first Director of UNESCO, had views on education similar to those of Robert Muller. Huxley was “1962 Humanist of the Year…a member of the Communistic Colonial Bureau of the British Fabian Society.”i

In 1948 Huxley wrote this:

In its education program, [UNESCO ] can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization…Political unification in some sort of world government will be required.ii

Teaching World Citizenship

One obstacle that world government proponents foresee is the patriotic education parents often give their children.

The Bible clearly teaches that parents are to be key teachers of their children:

Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it (Proverbs 22:6).

And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord (Ephesians 6:4).

Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee (Exodus 20:12).

Nevertheless, it has become a priority in global education curriculum to guide children away from the teaching they receive in the home.

John Stormer explains that under Huxley’s guidance, the United Nations prepared a guidebook for teachers. This guidebook reminds them that the “destruction of a child’s love of country and patriotism is the first step in educating that child for world citizenship.”

The report said on the opening page of Volume V, “In the Classroom with Children Under Thirteen Years of Age…Before the child enters school his mind has already been profoundly marked and often injuriously, by earlier influences…first gained, however dimly, in the home.”

On page 9, the teacher is told: “The kindergarten or infant school has a significant part to play in the child’s education. Not only can it correct many of the errors of home training but it can also prepare the child for membership, at about age seven, in a group of his own age and habits — the first of many such social identifications that he must achieve on his way to membership in the world society.iii

Stormer explains that “the UNESCO study makes it plain that the errors in home training include parental encouragement of patriotism. On page 58, the guidebook for teachers says: ‘As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The school should therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes.'”iv’

Stormer also tells us that the strategy for solving the “problem” of patriotism has already been decided:

UNESCO gives a specific suggestion in Volume V, page 11, on how this can be done: “In our view, history and geography should be taught at this age as universal history and geography…The study of history…raises problems of value which are better postponed until the pupil is freed from the nationalist prejudices which at present surround the teaching of history.v

It is clear that the spiritual and political aims of the UN are being carried out through the push to global education.

A Global Economic Order

In order for a new government to control the world, it must have power. As we can see from the following quotes, a new global government is preparing to take control by monopolizing the money and food distribution. This way, the global government will bring the nations to their knees—all the while seeming like the good-‐hearted saviour come to feed the hungry.

Buckminster Fuller said this, in essence, in an interview with Constance Cumbey:
Don’t give me any other job. Just let me be head of the World Food Authority, and I’ll have the whole world at my feet tomorrow!i

The World Goodwill Commentary tells us about the United Nations’ plans:
The UN, through its international conferences and special sessions, has called the world’s attention to…the need for a new international economic order…the work of the UN goes forward, steadily building the foundation for a new world order.ii

An earlier edition of the Commentary tells us this:

Many United Nations agencies such as the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), World Health Organisation (WHO), UNICEF and the World Bank are coordinating their efforts to correct this chronic global problem of hunger…the new world order cannot proceed without it.iii
A new economic order means a new world order. In fact, by controlling the food supply under the guise of dealing will world hunger, the United Nations can actually control the world’s population. Reducing the global population has been part of the New Age world order plan from the beginning.

New Age Benjamin Creme said this:
…a complete change in the world’s financial and economic order is imperative.iv

He also said this:

The food exists. It is simply not distributed. The Hierarchy have plans already made, ready to be put into effect when the will is there, which will equally distribute the food. There is a group of high Initiates—industrialists, economists, administrators, of great experience and achievement—who, with Hierarchy, have worked out plans and blueprints which will solve the redistribution problems of the world, when the political will is there to implement them. These plans are there, ready to transform the world. This can be done in no time at all.v

The UN is in agreement with the social and spiritual movements who say that an economic order is crucial for a new world order. A World Goodwill study says this: “New International Economic Order” (NIEO) is definitely needed. World Goodwill tells us that the “quest for a N.I.E.O. was initiated in 1974 at a special session of the U.N. General Assembly.”vi

The Humanist Manifesto agrees:

A socialized and cooperative economic order must be established…vii
As do the members of the UN:

We, the members of the United Nations…solemnly proclaim our united determination to work urgently for The Establishment of a new economic international order.viii
So what are we to think? Is a rearranging of the world’s resources best for everyone? Consider this reminder from Revelation 17:12-‐14:

The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast. They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast. They will make war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will overcome them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings—and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers.

A Global Religion

As we have seen, the crux of the Unites Nations’ new world order is global control, in part through a new world religion. As Robert Muller, former Assistant Secretary-‐ General of the United Nations says, “Was it not inevitable that the UN would sooner or later also acquire a spiritual dimension?”i

This new religion encompasses all existing religions into its worship of the New Age Cosmic Christ, who is Satan. And the United Nations is at the forefront of this spiritual movement. According to James Wardner, New Ager William Irwin Thomson says that, “the form of the church in the New Age will remain the same; thus, churchgoers are less likely to notice that there has been a change in the message.

He says, “the new spirituality does not reject the earlier patterns of the great universal religions. Priest and church will not disappear; they will not be forced out of existence in the New Age, they will be absorbed into existence of the New Age.”ii

Robert Muller and New Age theosophist Alice Bailey explain this concept further:

Robert Muller’s Thoughts on Global Religion

Do not worry if not all religions will join the United religions organization. Many nations did not join the UN at its beginning, but later regretted (sic) it and made every effort to join. It was the same with the European community and it will be the case with the world’s religions because whoever stays out or aloof will sooner or later regret it.iii

Pope John Paul II said that we were the stonecutters and artisans of a cathedral which we might never see in its finished beauty. I would not have dreamed that when I joined the United Nations a third of a century ago. The scope of the UN has widened in every direction, owing to the imperatives of a new global interdependent world. But people do not really know how vast and vital its activities are…
The tapestry of its work encompasses the total condition of humankind on this planet. All this is part of one of the most prodigious pages of evolution. It will require the detachment and objectivity of future historians to appraise fully what happened in the last third of our century and to understand what the real significance of the United Nations was.iv

There is a famous poster which shows Christ knocking at the tall United Nations building, wanting to enter it. I often visualize in my mind another even more accurate painting: that of a United Nations which would be the body of Christ.v

Peace will be impossible without the taming of fundamentalism through a United Religion that professes faithfulness only to the global spirituality and to the health of this planet.vi

I am more and more drawn to some of the very simple but extremely important teachings of the Christ and of all the great prophets and visionaries. I am increasingly convinced that what they foresaw is beginning to become a reality on this planet and that humanity is transcending or metamorphosing itself into what those great dreamers, visionaries and prophets envisioned.vii

The world’s major religions in the end all want the same thing, even though they were born in different places and circumstances on this planet. What the world needs today is a convergence of the different religions in the search for and definition of the cosmic or divine laws which ought to regulate our behavior on this planet. World-wide spiritual ecumenism, expressed in new forms of religious cooperation and institutions, would probably be closest to the heart of the resurrected Christ.viii

No human force will ever be able to destroy the United Nations, for the United Nations is not a mere building or a mere idea; it is not a man-made creation. The United Nations is the vision-light of the Absolute Supreme, which is slowly, steadily, and unerringly illuminating the ignorance, the night of our human life. The divine success and supreme progress of the United Nations is bound to become a reality. At his choice hour, the Absolute Supreme will ring his own victory-bell here on Earth through the loving and serving heart of the United Nations.ix

My great personal dream is to get a tremendous alliance between all the major religions and the UN.x

Muller is right when he says that the UN “is not a man-‐made creation.” It is another pawn in the diabolical plan to steal God’s Kingdom—a plan that will ultimately fail when Christ returns to claim what is His.

Alice Bailey’s Thoughts on Global Religion

There will not be any dissociation between the Universal Church, the Sacred Lodge of all true Masons and the inner circles of the esoteric societies…In this way, the goals and work of the United Nations shall be solidified and a new Church of God, led by all the religions and by all of the spiritual groups, shall put an end to the great heresy of separateness.xi

The New World Religion must be based upon those truths [Right human relations, peace] which have stood the test of the ages…they are steadily taking shape in human thinking, and for them the United Nations fights.xii

The same old formulas, the same old theologies and the same old interpretations are deemed adequate to meet man’s modern needs and enquiries. They are not. The church today is the tomb of the Christ and the stone of theology has been rolled to the door of the sepulcher.xiii

Thus the expressed aims and efforts of the United Nations will be eventually brought to fruition and a new church of God, gathered out of all religions and spiritual groups, will unitedly bring to an end the great heresy of separateness. Love, unity, and the Risen Christ will be present, and He will demonstrate to us the perfect life.xiv

The day is dawning when all religions will be regarded as emanating from one great spiritual source; all will be seen as unitedly providing the one root out of which the universal world religion will inevitably emerge. Then there will be neither Christian nor heathen, neither Jew nor Gentile, but simply one great body of believers, gathered out of all the current religions. They will accept the same truths, not as theological concepts but as essential to spiritual living; They will stand together on the same platform of brotherhood and of human relations; they will recognize divine sonship and will seek unitedly to co-operate with the divine Plan…such a world religion is no idle dream but something which is definitely forming today.xv

It’s Happening

Unfortunately, the unity of religions that Muller and Bailey called for is taking place. As Bailey says, this global religion “is definitely forming today.”

In June of 1995, an Interfaith Summit Conference was held in San Francisco for the purpose of “uniting the world’s religions into a global organization.” Called the United Religions Organization (URO), this organization is an international, inter-‐ religious organization modeled after and affiliated with the United Nations.

“According to its literature,” states W.B. Howard of Despatch Ministries, “the URO launched its written charter this past June 1997. The institution should be fully in place by June 2000 and globally operational by June, 2005.”xvi

The URO will “cooperate closely with the U.N. and its organizations to complement the U.N.’s political, diplomatic and social mandates, influence U.N. policy and support its programs.”xvii

These are just the first steps in creating a religion to fit everyone. As a 1996 issue of Discernment Newsletter reminds us, “The mystical traditions in the mainline denominations easily interact with those of the heathen religions of the world.
Meditation practices, ‘visualization’ techniques, and breathing exercises are now being used to ‘tap into’ the spiritual realm. In this, such religious leaders as the Pope and the Dalai Lama are very much on the same plane.”xviii

World Goodwill, a New Age organization, explains the goals of the new global religion:

The churches and the world religions should indicate the unity within all facets of truth which will provide a universal platform, one to which all men everywhere could give allegiance. Such a platform should include: The truth that…all men are divine. The truth that evolution governs the growth of the human being…The fact of immortality and of eternal persistence [reincarnation], arising from man’s essential divinity.xix

The coming world teacher will be mainly concerned, not with the result of past error and inadequacy but with the requirements of a new world order and with the reorganisation of the social structure.”xx

In August 2000, an article appeared in Le Soir, a Belgian national newspaper, about this global religion based in the UN. Here is an excerpt:

A general rehearsal is taking place at the highest level, in a forum where the Supreme Being, grand architect, or watchmaker of the universe, if he exists at all, is to recognise his own…at a time when the United Nations will shortly host the summit of the millennium, with the presence of the heads of state of the entire world, all the world’s religious leaders have been gathering in New York to discuss the most important theme of world peace and tolerance.

The more distant objective: to create a kind of United Nations of faith where the representatives of faith and philosophies could meet and in order to discuss the future together, whilst abandoning their fatwas, theses, and other terrible arms of excommunication and exclusion and relegating them to the cloak room.

This is a very noble “ecumenical initiative”, with the widest possible meaning, having been called into being despite the lack of initiative of the UN, by Ted Turner, who funded the initiative. He is the vice-president of Time Warner Inc. and founder of CNN. For every sin there is grace: ten years ago, the flamboyant boss of instantaneous television had declared that Christianity was nothing but an affair for “losers and freaks.”xxi

It’s obvious that we each have a decision to make. As Joshua said so eloquently those thousands of years ago, “And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve…but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD” (Joshua 24:15).

Tolerance?

What is true tolerance? We see the word everywhere—in New Age teachings, UN statements, commands from the Vatican, and even in Christian ecumenical circles.

While the concept may conjure up warm emotions and seem crucial to successful life on Earth, what we see taught as “tolerance” today is really intolerance against those who refuse to conform.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)’s Declaration of the Principles of Tolerance says this:

Tolerance is the responsibility that upholds human rights, pluralism (including cultural pluralism), democracy and the rule of law. It involves the rejection of dogmatism and absolutism and affirms the standards set out in international human rights instruments…It also means that one’s views are not be be imposed on others.

New Age teacher and world unity supporter Alice A. Bailey taught that “non-‐ essential doctrines”—such as the seventh-‐day Sabbath—must be removed because they are a stumbling block for unity.i Is that true tolerance?

In a similar vein, note the conversation at a 1999 interfaith meeting:

As reported in the Associated Press, with the Dalai Lama sitting by his right side, this October [1999] in Rome the Pope presided at a special council of some 2000 religious leaders of various faiths, sects, and cults…The Pontiff told the assembled Buddhist monks, Zoroastrian priests, Catholic cardinals, Hindu gurus, American Indian shamen, Jewish rabbis, and ecumenical clergy that all must join in condemning the Christian fundamentalists who “abuse speech” and whose efforts at converting others “incite hatred and violence.”ii

All present were in accord on two key points: (1) Pope John Paul II was endorsed by consensus as the planet’s chief spiritual guide and overseer; and (2) Religious fundamentalists who refuse to go along with the global ecumenical movement are to be silenced. They must be denounced as “dangerous extremists full of hate.”iii

Ironically, the supposed religious tolerance of today is in fact exclusive intolerance against those who disagree with the majority. All who refuse to conform to doctrinal norms are therefore labeled “dangerous extremists.”

“The Heresy of Separateness”

The following quotes further show the world’s misguided fight against separateness and fundamentalism. Alice Bailey says this:

…other steps will also be taken in this department of religions and of education, over which the Christ rules, and He will move to restore the ancient spiritual landmarks, to eliminate that which is nonessential, and to reorganize the entire religious field— again in preparation for the restoration of the Mysteries. These Mysteries, when restored, will unify all faiths.iv

New Ager Natalie Banks says this:

Looking below the seething surface of outer events we become aware of the spreading move towards the elimination of the sectarian separativeness and an increasing distaste for reliance on hard and fast doctrine and dogma. At the same time there is an intensified search for a deeper understanding of the inner teachings and their application to the enormous problems of today.v

The Sabbath is a dividing issue. It is the cleaver that cleaves people out of the worldly way of life and into harmony with God’s precepts. Everyone needs to make a choice.

Thus, the ecumenical movement is contrary to the spirit of obedience that the Bible calls us to. Scriptures tell us that we should not be unequally yoked—that we should not enter unity with those who do not stand for truth. However, we see that those who preach the Three Angels’ Messages, are considered “fundamentalist” and “fanatical.”

Thomas Ehrenzeller, affiliated with the Association to Unite the Democracies, says this:

A growing number of people…are sponsoring a backlash against the wave of religious fundamental fanaticism…The right course to take is that which will lead to a new world of unity and world law.vi

Separateness is not heresy. Rather, it is what God calls us to in 2 Corinthians 6:17:Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.

The Call to Conform

As we draw nearer to the time of Christ’s return, New Age teachings on false unity grow stronger and louder. Already, the call towards a new world order is becoming commonplace in spiritual and political circles.

New Age teacher Alice Bailey says this:

In this statement, Bailey mimics Paul’s words to the Christians in Galatia:

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

However, unlike Bailey’s unity, which is based on compromising the truth and accepting the New Age Christ, Paul is advocating unity among Christians, drawn together by the truth found in Jesus Christ.

Robert Muller, author of the World Core Curriculum, writes this:
The world’s major religions must speed up dramatically their ecumenical movement and recognize the unity of their objectives in the diversity of their cults. Religions must actively cooperate to bring to unprecedented heights a better understanding of the mysteries of life and of our place in the universe. “My religion, right or wrong,” and “My nation, right or wrong” must be abandoned forever in the planetary age.ix

Consequences of Choosing Truth

God has called us to come out of Babylon—the religious and political order that the devil is setting up in the world today. But God never said it would be easy. In fact, Jesus tells us that persecution is just a fact of the Christian life:

These things I have spoken to you, that you should not be made to stumble. They will put you out of the synagogues; yes, the time is coming that whoever kills you will think that he offers God service.

And these things they will do to you because they have not known the Father nor Me. But these things I have told you, that when the time comes, you may remember that I told you of them (John 16:1-4 NKJV).

Christ’s words are coming true today. Here are some frightening statements from all corners of the world that tell us what is to happen to God’s remnant:

Population Control

A common topic in the discussion of the new world order is population control. The New Age movement teaches that the future world is to have fewer inhabitants than we have now.

Creation Spiritualist Matthew Fox, for example, says that the New Age will have four billion occupants.i John Randolph Price, author of The Superbeings, plainly identifies Christians in this statement: “There are some groups who continue to cling to the absurd idea that man is a miserable sinner and worm of the dust.” He then notifies us that “two and one-‐half billion people will be killed.”ii

R. Paulaseer Lawrie Muthukrishna, who supposedly was transfigured into Jesus in 1969, writes this:

A period of extreme tribulation and unprecedented misery is soon to cover the entire world…All events coming to light are pointing directly towards the end…Such wholesale destruction of the undesirable elements from the surface of the earth comes into effect at different places through different causes. It may be through storms and flood, through famine and diseases, through wars, through massacres or through heavenly calamities like volcanic upheavals…

Signs are evident that the destruction of the undesirable elements in the world has already commenced. There should be enormous bloodshed all over the world and the loss of life through various causes shall be so great that the world population shall be considerably reduced. The older order shall be changed and a new [order] shall be born. The new structure of the coming world shall stand on bones and ashes.iii

Ted Turner, founder of CNN, called Christianity a “religion for losers” and suggested that those who oppose abortion are “bozos.”iv He also suggested that US citizens should not have more than two children, and eventually that “A total world population of 250-‐300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”v

Prince Philip, former President of the World Wildlife Fund, said this:
In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.vi

The Georgia Guidestones—the American version of Stonehenge—has an inscription of 10 guides, or commandments, for surviving the post-‐apocalyptic world. The first command is “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature,” and the second supports it: “Guide reproduction wisely…”vii

Population control is seen today as a necessary means of dealing with global hunger and caring for the Earth. Ironically, the world today produces enough food for ten times its population, but unequal distribution and the severe gluttony of the West keep poverty rampant in the rest of the world. Poverty is not the problem. Greed is the problem.

While lowering the population may be “green” and good for the planet, have we considered how this reduction will take place? Who will be chosen to remain on Earth? Who will be wiped out?

Elimination of Defects

What happens to those who do not conform to the “tolerant” norm of global religious and political unity? As 1984 vice presidential candidate Barbara Marx Hubbard informs us, the consequences can be lethal:

Humanity will not be able to make the transition from Earth to universal life until the chaff has separated from the wheat…

No worldly peace can prevail until the self-centered members of the planetary body either change or die. That is the choice…they must surely die, or change…
This act is as horrible as killing a cancer cell. It must be done for the sake of the future of the whole…

There have always been defective seeds. In the past they were permitted to die a “natural death.” We, the elders have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow; something must be done before the whole body is destroyed.viii

Those who stand against the new world order become like a cancer cell that must either change or die? These threats are not dissimilar to papal statements.

Pope John Paul II wrote this:

Whoever denies or places in doubt any truth that must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or repudiates the Christian faith as a whole, and does not come to his senses after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished as a heretic…whoever obstinately rejects a teaching that the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops, exercising the authentic Magisterium, have set forth to be held definitively, or who affirms what they have condemned as erroneous, and does not retract after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished with an appropriate penalty.ix

Pope Nicholas I wrote this to the king of Bulgaria:

I glorify you for having maintained your authority by putting to death those wandering sheep who refused to enter the fold.x

New Age leaders agree with these political and religious reforms. The demonic force Djwhal Khul, speaking through Alice Bailey, uses similar language:

A violent streptococcic germ and infection has menaced the life of humanity…makes its presence felt in infected areas in the body of humanity…

Another surgical operation may be necessary…to dissipate the infection and get rid of the fever…let us never forget that…when a [life] form proves inadequate, or too diseased, or too crippled for the expression of that purpose, it is…no disaster when that form has to go. Death is not a disaster to be feared; the work of the destroyer is not really cruel or undesirable… Therefore, there is much destruction permitted by the Custodians of the Plan and much evil turned into good.xi

Self-‐proclaimed psychic Ruth Montgomery writes that “souls…will have passed on into spirit to rethink their attitudes.”xii

A former New Ager, Randall Baer, states that those who refuse the mark of the Beast will be targeted “for extermination in what would euphemistically be called re-‐ education centers of love and relocation, that is, death camps in disguise.”xiii
Dr. Mortimer Adler, former chairman of the Board of Editors of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., director of the Institute for Philosophical Research in Chicago, chairman of the Paideia Project, and honorary trustee of the Aspen Institute, had strong views on this issue:

Simply stated, Adler argues that we will not be able to attain world peace until we attain cultural unity. But, Adler argues that there is only one obstacle to this unity— Christianity…

Adler’s point is simple—Christianity claims “supernatural knowledge” and “divine revelation” that is divisive and not open to rational debate, and should not be tolerated (all emphases added).xiv

The Christian churches must also kill out all separativeness and learn to cooperate with all the other faiths…those Scriptures are of equal value and beauty as the New Testament.xv

Occultist Dr. Christopher Hyatt refers to Christian fundamentalists as “The Shadow emerging in Society.” Author Texe Marrs describes Hyatt’s position this way:
He predicted, however, that the fundamentalist forces will be overcome. There will be a “changing of the guards.” Hyatt went on to reveal just how this “changing of the guards” will take place. “I see,” he stressed, “that the earth still requires some blood before it is ready to move into new and different areas…I see [the New Age] has required…a lot of blood, disruption, chaos, and pain for a mass change to occur.”xvi

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the man who brought the occultic practice of Transcendental Meditation (TM) to the West, has said this in reference to those who won’t practice ™:

There has not and there will not be a place for the unfit. The fit will lead, and if the unfit are not coming along there is no place for them…In the Age of Enlightenment there is no place for ignorant people.xvii

To Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and other New Age thinkers, the “unfit” and “ignorant” are those who refuse to join their movement of global religious unity under the New Age Christ.

These horrific statements are beyond scary. But they do tell us that we must make a decision between the kingdom of darkness and the Kingdom of God. And if we choose God’s Kingdom, we can have peace, knowing He is in control.

These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world (John 16:33).

Author: Amazing Discoveries

Download the PDF link to this article here :

Watch: